photoshop is the maximum expresion of fakeness why woman can’t accept them selfs as they are, they must us this to be beautifull?? are you kidding?? a woman that doesn’t need to use make up or photoshop to be beautifull is the hottest woman on earth

a) black and white has still not been replaces by color.
b) until very recently film still surpassed digital in quality, it’s ridiculous for you to say that digital is a huge improvement. that’s completely subjective.
don’t write about photography if you clearly don’t know what you’re saying, or at least make it clear that it is all opinion.

Most of these are vector images, which is not that impressive, its basicly just point and fill in paint. The once that arent vector are not that good ether.

Photoshop it maybe but its the talent of the artit that can create something a aweome as these image :D

Oddney, thank you! I was hoping at least one commenter would know what a vector is, and why it takes little talent to achieve (pixeldamnation, you’ve got it all backwards)
Also, everyone’s saying “oh sure photoshop blah blah blah”, I’ll bet you that every vector here was done in Illustrator, not Photoshop.
Oh and “photoshop” (if that IS your real name!), get over yourself. This is a compilation of some pretty DRAWN PICTURES (not airbrushed photos, though… vectors aren’t far off it, BUT I DIGRESS). Yes, they’re all “ideal” women, but does that mean all artists should just start drawing ugly women to appease your feminist ideals? Photoshop isn’t what made people strive to look better, nor is it the first time people have made unachievable standards in art. The only thing that has changed is what is considered beauty. Those baby faced, small busted wide hipped women from old renaissance paintings were practically their version of Playboy. Don’t try and act like Photoshop was the beginning of unrealistic ideals.

Our software makes people who luck f**k ugly look beautiful, as you can see in the pictures above!